| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2013-03-09 19:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFQutc09zmbg3t_YKPqYtXka9OcWviZq=ok=h13tzFz3w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for updating the patch!
- "SELECT reltoastidxid "
- "FROM info_rels i JOIN pg_catalog.pg_class c "
- " ON i.reloid = c.oid"));
+ "SELECT indexrelid "
+ "FROM info_rels i "
+ " JOIN pg_catalog.pg_class c "
+ " ON i.reloid = c.oid "
+ " JOIN pg_catalog.pg_index p "
+ " ON i.reloid = p.indrelid "
+ "WHERE p.indexrelid >= %u ", FirstNormalObjectId));
This new SQL doesn't seem to be right. Old one doesn't pick up any indexes
other than toast index, but new one seems to do.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2013-03-09 20:52:28 | Re: Why do we still perform a check for pre-sorted input within qsort variants? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2013-03-09 19:38:34 | Re: Why do we still perform a check for pre-sorted input within qsort variants? |