Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index
Date: 2014-11-12 12:30:21
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFL7uzSxap7j9+ZgZyJyrDh5OnQSXgiX_oE9bqc_B_dOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Not to kibitz too much after-the-fact, but wouldn't it be better to
>>> give this a name that has "GIN" in it somewhere?
>
>> Maybe. gin_pending_list_cleanup_size? gin_pending_list_limit? Better name?
>
> gin_pending_list_limit sounds good to me.

OK, barring any objection, I will rename the reloption and GUC to
gin_pending_list_limit.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-11-12 12:39:03 Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW
Previous Message Pankaj Bagul 2014-11-12 12:10:51 how to determine clause for new keyword, how to add new clause in gram.y