Re: tab completion for setting search_path

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tab completion for setting search_path
Date: 2014-07-07 11:51:50
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEphPWToZ18xnGH53YH6E3JKs_C3jvrQPMMVQb8ccAGAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 2014-06-23 13:10:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I would be for excluding the pg_toast, pg_toast_temp_n, and
>>>> > pg_temp_n schemas, and including public and pg_catalog.
>>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Jeff, are you willing to update the patch that way? Seems we have
>>> something several people can live with ;)
>>
>> I was hoping not to add a third set of filters (separate from the ones
>> already implicit in either \dn or \dnS), but that's OK; as long as I get a
>> doghouse I won't worry much about the color.
>>
>> I've included information_schema as well, in analogy to the inclusion of
>> pg_catalog.

Is there any blocker on this patch? The patch looks good to me.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2014-07-07 11:56:42 Re: Allowing join removals for more join types
Previous Message Asif Naeem 2014-07-07 11:38:39 Re: [bug fix or improvement?] Correctly place DLLs for ECPG apps in bin folder