Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Date: 2012-05-10 18:29:20
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEdHYjWehfDN=6G9g5kFn_TZ5r3C3jxjL6uLxy0+2Wpgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> And taking this a step further - we *already* send these GUCs.
> Previous references to us not doing that were incorrect :-)
>
> So this should be a much easier fix than we thought. And can be done
> entirely in pg_basebackup, meaning we don't need to worry about
> beta...

Sounds good!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-10 18:29:47 Re: Draft release notes complete
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-05-10 18:22:58 Re: Draft release notes complete