Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Date: 2013-12-10 14:32:44
Message-ID: CAGTBQpZQROubRkV=3VQJXt629xj4C9pQ+GnYJOjfFm7ZTs+Bkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2013 08:28, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Doesn't all that assume a normally distributed random variable?
>>
>> I don't think so because of the law of large numbers. If you have a large
>> population and sample it the sample behaves like a normal distribution when
>> if the distribution of the population isn't.
>
>
> No, the large population says that if you have an AVERAGE of many
> samples of a random variable, the random variable that is the AVERAGE
> behaves like a normal.

Sorry, that should be "No, the *law of large numbers* says..."

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-12-10 14:55:54 Re: Extra functionality to createuser
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2013-12-10 14:32:14 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good