Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres?

From: John Mudd <johnbmudd(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres?
Date: 2014-04-13 20:04:34
Message-ID: CAGDMk9F7KOUFJkRhAG7KG7rXSei-ddKCpVEb9X+yRo7t4MDAdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

I agree, not a bug. I was just following the instructions to post as bug
first and then move to hackers if directed. I'll repost on hackers and give
the rest of my reply there.

On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>wrote:

> On 13-04-2014 00:40, John Mudd wrote:
> > I built Postgres 9.3.4 from source on top of the musl C library,
> > http://www.musl-libc.org/
> > I also built zlib, bzip2, ncurses, openssl, readline and Python using
> musl
> > as a foundation for Postgres.
> >
> This is not a bug. This kind of discussion belongs to -hackers.
>
> --
> Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
> PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Mudd 2014-04-13 20:08:00 Fwd: Debug strategy for musl Postgres?
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2014-04-13 16:04:15 Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Mudd 2014-04-13 20:08:00 Fwd: Debug strategy for musl Postgres?
Previous Message David Rowley 2014-04-13 19:45:25 Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)