From: | John Mudd <johnbmudd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
Date: | 2014-04-13 20:04:34 |
Message-ID: | CAGDMk9F7KOUFJkRhAG7KG7rXSei-ddKCpVEb9X+yRo7t4MDAdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
I agree, not a bug. I was just following the instructions to post as bug
first and then move to hackers if directed. I'll repost on hackers and give
the rest of my reply there.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>wrote:
> On 13-04-2014 00:40, John Mudd wrote:
> > I built Postgres 9.3.4 from source on top of the musl C library,
> > http://www.musl-libc.org/
> > I also built zlib, bzip2, ncurses, openssl, readline and Python using
> musl
> > as a foundation for Postgres.
> >
> This is not a bug. This kind of discussion belongs to -hackers.
>
> --
> Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
> PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Mudd | 2014-04-13 20:08:00 | Fwd: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2014-04-13 16:04:15 | Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Mudd | 2014-04-13 20:08:00 | Fwd: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2014-04-13 19:45:25 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |