is prefix pg_ reservated ?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: is prefix pg_ reservated ?
Date: 2012-08-07 11:16:19
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDpR2=0ea813XoREygX5f-=tpg8x0MA+JKCE+6pTWoOJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello all

I found strange behave of postgresql. I would to use name
pg_stat_get_some for custom function. Probably it is not smart from
me, because I found so functions that has prefix pg are not searched
via search_path.

postgres=# select public.pg_stat_get_creation_time('xxx'::regclass);
pg_stat_get_creation_time
-------------------------------
2012-08-07 12:43:25.592137+02
(1 row)

postgres=# select pg_stat_get_creation_time('xxx'::regclass);
ERROR: internal function "pg_stat_get_creation_time" is not in
internal lookup table

It is expected and desired behave?

Regards

Pavel Stehule

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-08-07 12:39:09 Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-08-07 07:59:42 Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious