Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marcin Mańk <marcin(at)maniek(dot)info>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date: 2015-09-20 05:31:04
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD+vPiQObB5+tiEhEUFpuG4iXewrzkyFDzTi299rb=ZhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-09-19 8:03 GMT+02:00 Marcin Mańk <marcin(at)maniek(dot)info>:

>
>
> W dniu piątek, 18 września 2015 Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> > in the help inside your last patch, you are using "crosstab". Cannto be
>> > crosstab the name for this feature?
>>
>> If it wasn't taken already by contrib/tablefunc, that would be a first
>> choice. But now, when searching for crosstab+postgresql, pages of
>> results come out concerning the crosstab() function.
>>
> How about transpose (or flip)?
>

transpose or flip are synonyms for rotate

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian.Vondendriesch 2015-09-20 12:16:15 Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-09-20 04:50:29 Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file