From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marcin Mańk <marcin(at)maniek(dot)info> |
Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql |
Date: | 2015-09-20 05:31:04 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD+vPiQObB5+tiEhEUFpuG4iXewrzkyFDzTi299rb=ZhA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-09-19 8:03 GMT+02:00 Marcin Mańk <marcin(at)maniek(dot)info>:
>
>
> W dniu piątek, 18 września 2015 Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> > in the help inside your last patch, you are using "crosstab". Cannto be
>> > crosstab the name for this feature?
>>
>> If it wasn't taken already by contrib/tablefunc, that would be a first
>> choice. But now, when searching for crosstab+postgresql, pages of
>> results come out concerning the crosstab() function.
>>
> How about transpose (or flip)?
>
transpose or flip are synonyms for rotate
Pavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian.Vondendriesch | 2015-09-20 12:16:15 | Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-20 04:50:29 | Re: A better translation version of Chinese for psql/po/zh_CN.po file |