Re: psql output change in 9.4

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql output change in 9.4
Date: 2014-08-11 18:22:46
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB8dNR+oyniMTx1zLfEjvoUW-EijKL4Qh35fKzwpEPzOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-08-11 19:52 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >> What is the point of that change?
>
> > I think the output could justly be criticized for making it
> > insufficiently clear that the parenthesized text is, in fact, the name
> > of the pset parameter.
>
> Quite; that wasn't apparent to me either.
>
> > We could write something like:
> > Border style (parameter "border") is 1.
>
> How about
>
> Border style (\pset border) is 1.
>
>
+1

Pavel

> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-08-11 18:25:22 Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-08-11 18:04:31 Re: replication commands and log_statements