Re: Commitfest status

Hi

2014-09-03 13:18 GMT+02:00 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>:

> We now have 32 patches in "Needs Review" state, and 7 of those don't have
> a reviewer assigned. They are:
>
> 1. Grouping Sets

I plan to do review of Grouping Sets, but I am afraid so I cannot to do in
next two weeks.

Regards

Pavel

> 2. hash join - dynamic bucket count
> 3. Enable WAL archiving even in standby
> 4. Selectivity estimation for inet operators
> 5. Better syntax for REINDEX
> 6. pgcrypto: support PGP signatures
> 7. pgcrypto: PGP armour headers
>
> Out of these, the first 4 have generated a fair amount of discussion on
> the list, but no-one has dared to put down their name as a reviewer. What
> is the real status of these patches, are the authors really waiting for a
> review at this stage? Authors: please speak up and update the status to
> "Returned with Feedback" or "Waiting on Author", if you know how to
> proceed. Others: If you have been involved in the discussions, please sign
> up as a reviewer and make a decision on how to move forward with the patch.
>
> I think the latter 3 patches are missing a reviewer because no-one is
> interested in them. There was some discussion on the REINDEX syntax, and
> whether we want the patch at all. The pgcrypto patches have received zero
> comments.
>
> If you think that a feature is worthwhile, please sign up as a reviewer.
> If these patches don't have a reviewer assigned by the end of the week, I'm
> going to mark them as Rejected on the grounds that no-one cares about them.
>
> - Heikki
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>