Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date: 2015-01-29 07:31:18
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAooeHyRZeBCSUviM=pZoLL9WkTSzVhg-qtygRV3K39BA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

I am testing this feature on relative complex schema (38619 tables in db)
and I got deadlock

[pavel(at)localhost bin]$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/vacuumdb test2 -fz -j 4
vacuumdb: vacuuming database "test2"
vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "test2" failed: ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 24689 waits for RowExclusiveLock on relation 2608 of
database 194769; blocked by process 24690.
Process 24690 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 1249 of database
194769; blocked by process 24689.
HINT: See server log for query details.

ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 24689 waits for RowExclusiveLock on relation 2608 of
database 194769; blocked by process 24690.
Process 24690 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 1249 of
database 194769; blocked by process 24689.
Process 24689: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_attribute;
Process 24690: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_depend;
HINT: See server log for query details.
STATEMENT: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_attribute;
ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
STATEMENT: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_depend;
ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
STATEMENT: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_class;
ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
STATEMENT: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_proc;
LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
STATEMENT: VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) pg_catalog.pg_proc;
FATAL: connection to client lost
LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
FATAL: connection to client lost

Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Size |
Description
------------+-------------------------+-------+----------+------------+-------------
pg_catalog | pg_attribute | table | postgres | 439 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_rewrite | table | postgres | 314 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_proc | table | postgres | 136 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_depend | table | postgres | 133 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_class | table | postgres | 69 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_attrdef | table | postgres | 55 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_trigger | table | postgres | 47 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_type | table | postgres | 31 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_description | table | postgres | 23 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_index | table | postgres | 20 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_constraint | table | postgres | 17 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_shdepend | table | postgres | 17 MB |
pg_catalog | pg_statistic | table | postgres | 928 kB |
pg_catalog | pg_operator | table | postgres | 552 kB |
pg_catalog | pg_collation | table | postgres | 232 kB |

Regards

Pavel Stehule

2015-01-27 3:26 GMT+01:00 Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>:

> On 23 January 2015 21:10, Alvaro Herrera Wrote,
>
>
> > In case you're up for doing some more work later on, there are two
> > ideas
> > here: move the backend's TranslateSocketError to src/common, and try to
> > merge pg_dump's select_loop function with the one in this new code.
> > But that's for another patch anyway (and this new function needs a
> > little battle-testing, of course.)
> >
> Thanks for your effort, I will take it up for next commitfest..
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2015-01-29 08:09:15 Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
Previous Message Daniel Bausch 2015-01-29 07:10:10 Re: Parallel Seq Scan