From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: regrole type? |
Date: | 2012-12-25 18:24:01 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAWdBKb1kW-h7V96W4=6yoqDO24cyUmp2Xo+S0xt2VLvQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
2012/12/25 Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>:
> Hello, Pavel.
>
> You wrote:
>
> PS> Hello
>
> PS> Can we implement REGROLE type, that simplify role name <-> oid transformations?
>
> +1 from me. My old wish.
I started implementation. I found a two points, that should be solved before.
we operate over roles with (without) fictive role "public". So we need
two datatypes :( I have no idea about second name :( - there should be
difference if type enables or disallow "public".
second issue is value of ACL_ID_PUBLIC, that is zero - and there is
not difference from InvalidOid - what should be acceptable via "-"
symbol.
Any ideas?
Regards
Pavel
>
> PS> Regards
>
> PS> Pavel
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-12-25 18:42:24 | Re: Event Triggers: adding information |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-25 18:22:54 | Re: proposal: regrole type? |