| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "[pgdg] Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements |
| Date: | 2014-03-31 19:57:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+rFQo+vDEp=ZKsjLNsphxyhbXtQc0dqWojD0XLOd1HjbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> * Fabrízio de Royes Mello (fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > - CREATE SEQUENCE [ IF NOT EXISTS ]
> > - CREATE DOMAIN [ IF NOT EXISTS ]
> > - CREATE EVENT TRIGGER [ IF NOT EXISTS ]
> > - CREATE ROLE [ IF NOT EXISTS ]
> >
> > Seems that no one reviewed this part or was rejected with others?
>
> Why don't those fall into the same concern, specifically that what we
> really want is 'CREATE-OR-REPLACE' semantics for them instead?
>
Ok, but I think this semantics is desirable just to "CREATE DOMAIN" and
"CREATE EVENT TRIGGER".
Isn't desirable add CINE to SEQUENCEs and ROLEs?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-03-31 20:00:49 | Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-03-31 19:52:15 | Re: Patch to add support of "IF NOT EXISTS" to others "CREATE" statements |