From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 19:01:34 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+r8pTczW+pGk7FtEgWm4PV_y5z4TuYPa6n+ApAK8EiChg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 03:04 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de
> > <mailto:cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> is there a reason there's no ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
> >>
> >> The natural idiom to reset SET statements is "RESET guc;", I don't
> >> think "SET guc = default;" is in use much, so "ALTER SYSTEM RESET guc;"
> >> would be the natural way to try.
> >
> > Currently you can achieve that by
> > "ALTER SYSTEM RESET guc = Default;".
> > However it will be good to have support for RESET as well. I think it
> > should not be too complicated to implement that syntax, I personally
> > don't have bandwidth to it immediately, but I would like to take care
> > of it unless you or someone wants to do it by the time I get some
> > bandwidth.
>
> Would something like this suffice?
>
>
Is fine to me...
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-06-25 19:14:18 | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-25 18:52:30 | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |