Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> You plan to commit it?
> >
> > Yes unless many people object the commit.
> >
> > Michael, you're now modifying the patch?
> OK, I have been able to put my head into that earlier than I thought
> as it would be better to get that done before the beta, finishing with
> the attached. When hacking that, I noticed that some tests were
> missing for some of the operators. I am including them in this patch
> as well, with more tests for unique index creation, ordering, and
> hash/btree index creation. The test suite looks cleaner with all that.
>
>
Last night I sent a patch [1] to add more tests and change the operator
name. Maybe we can merge the test cases... ;-)

Regards,

[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+pMViL+X1kF3pumc2Cp+e1jUoGBDMyZ+SE0PLRR9tmAWw@mail.gmail.com

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello