Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 4/17/14, 8:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We could in fact implement #2, I imagine, by destroying and recreating
> > the entire language interpreter. So I could imagine implementing a
> > "DISCARD INTERPRETERS" kind of command that would zap the current
> > interpreter(s) for whichever PL languages happened to feel like
> > cooperating with the command.
>
> More generally, any extension could maintain any kind of cross-call
> state. plproxy, dblink, pgmemcache come to mind. A general hook into
> DISCARD might be doable, but then it's not clear how to categorize this
> into DISCARD subcommands.
>

I proposed some like that in a previous message [1].

Regards,

[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+p+PMFhkiPTF1Xbz3neG8d0MtEnb021H2FUG049333LrQ@mail.gmail.com

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello