| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dobes Vandermeer <dobesv(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tips/advice for implementing integrated RESTful HTTP API |
| Date: | 2014-08-31 15:34:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+oz_D57E9K5japfh-JECpKzt4cOE3UtNUdkzsLwSh1GgA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em domingo, 31 de agosto de 2014, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
escreveu:
> On 8/31/14 12:40 AM, Dobes Vandermeer wrote:
> > The background workers can apparently only connect to a single database
> > at a time, but I want to expose all the databases via the API.
>
> I think the term "background worker" should be taken as a hint that
> "foreground protocol endpoint" was not one of the envisioned use cases.
> I think this sort of thing should be done as a separate process in
> front of the postmaster.
>
>
+1
Do you know the PGRest project?
Look at http://pgre.st
Regards,
Fabrízio
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2014-08-31 15:37:50 | Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS - unrecognized node type: 347 |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-08-31 15:25:49 | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |