Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

From: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Date: 2014-07-15 11:09:01
Message-ID: CAEZqfEc-hr0gSKOJi4KgBEg1P3_HZPvgRRvMKhqFEFBZTh+edQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kaigai-san,

2014-07-14 22:18 GMT+09:00 Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>:
> Hanada-san,
>
> Thanks for your checking. The attached v4 patch is rebased one on the
> latest master branch. Indeed, merge conflict was trivial.
>
> Updates from the v3 are below:
> - custom-plan.sgml was renamed to custom-plan-provider.sgml
> - fix up the comments in pg_custom_plan_provider.h that mentioned
> about old field name.
> - applied your patch to fix up typos. (thanks so much!)
> - put "costs off" on the EXPLAIN command in the regression test of
> ctidscan extension.

Checked, but the patch fails sanity-check test, you need to modify
expected file of the test.

> Nothing to comment on the design and implementation from your
> viewpoint any more?

As much as I can tell, the design seems reasonable. After fix for the
small issue above, I'll move the patch status to "Ready for
committer".

--
Shigeru HANADA

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-07-15 11:46:27 Re: Removing dependency to wsock32.lib when compiling code on WIndows
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-07-15 10:38:38 Re: timeout of pg_receivexlog --status-interval