Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used
Date: 2013-02-11 09:01:28
Message-ID: CAEZATCXqEFirZCGft=5F6zRNbu7hHpZFzs1ZtuafinvxSo6Jwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 February 2013 12:37, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> >>
Here is my first draft. I've also attached the generated HTML page,
>> because it's not so easy to read an SGML patch.
>>
>
> nice
>
> I have only one point - I am think, so format function should be in
> table 9-6 - some small text with reference to special section.
>

It is already there in table 9-6, referring to the new section.

Here is a minor update though -- I changed the name of the first
optional argument from "str" to "formatarg", since they are no longer
necessarily strings.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment Content-Type Size
format-width.doc.v2.patch application/octet-stream 9.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-02-11 10:26:43 Re: Improving pgbench to log index creation time etc.
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2013-02-11 08:46:08 Re: Too frequent checkpoints ?