Re: MD5 aggregate

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MD5 aggregate
Date: 2013-06-14 14:49:31
Message-ID: CAEZATCXUfLS3U1nTFynvAtuhmRTBOV96Jo3-WX3gvcefQo-qWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 June 2013 15:19, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
>> I'd rather go the other way, processing the records without having
>> to process them otherwise at all. Turning things into text must slow
>> things down, surely.
>
> That's certainly an interesting idea also..
>

md5_agg(record) ?

Yes, I like it.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-06-14 14:56:57 Re: MD5 aggregate
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-06-14 14:47:25 Re: MD5 aggregate