Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Date: 2013-01-21 14:33:52
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WfS=QMMb-E=n7SCZEpifLd_3v=w7wuMviK_J9peTouLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 January 2013 13:10, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> What filesystem did you use for testing? Would you also provide /proc/cpuinfo
> or a rough description of the system's CPUs?

Unfortunately, I don't have access to that server at the moment. It's
under Greg Smith's control. I believe you yourself had an account on
this server at one point. I do know that the CPU is an Intel Core
i7-870:

http://ark.intel.com/products/41315/Intel-Core-i7-870-Processor-8M-Cache-2_93-GHz

I am pretty sure that the filesystem that the various block devices
were mounted with was ext4 (without LVM), but it might have been XFS.
I don't recall. The operating system was Debian Lenny.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit kapila 2013-01-21 15:06:52 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-21 14:19:30 Re: pg_upgrade and system() return value