Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)
Date: 2012-10-18 15:25:57
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WMQCYfKPPBsXErzih-WEfwX4aqFjVBstPurbaewqYKBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 October 2012 16:18, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> A "shim" adds complexity, but retains the "upgrade across versions"
> use case, and reduces the need to keep supporting elder versions of
> Slony.

Right. Upgrading across major versions is likely to continue to remain
a very important use-case for Slony.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-10-18 15:26:33 Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-10-18 15:20:27 Re: First draft of snapshot snapshot building design document