| From: | Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add more regression tests for CREATE OPERATOR |
| Date: | 2013-07-01 21:52:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAEP4nAzjOj_28F=95NCjm-uZ2YaR1ffDodPMhVbGAOFwU6wdZQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 June 2013 02:26, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So technically I hope this regression patch I submitted could go through
> since this feedback isn't towards that patch, but in my part I am quite
> intrigued about this test (and how it passes) and probably I'd get back on
> this thread about this particular commented out test in question, as time
> permits.
>
>
Attached is an updated (cumulative) patch, that takes care of the issue
mentioned above and tests two more cases that were skipped earlier.
--
Robins Tharakan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| regress_createoperator_v3.txt | text/plain | 9.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luis Carvalho | 2013-07-01 22:15:15 | PL/Lua (was: plpython implementation) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-01 21:50:38 | Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort |