Re: GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2014-02-28 16:25:00
Message-ID: CAE2gYzyfHdRPZKpbgp7Pi1B1d6Mz1NkLtFVWGWCvfeYNqxkfOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-02-28 17:30, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>:
> Hm, what if we put the new opclass into an extension of its own, say inet_gist,
> instead of into core?

It will work but I do not think it is better than adding it in core as
not default.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2014-02-28 16:49:48 Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-02-28 16:13:26 Re: jsonb and nested hstore