Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Shigeru HANADA <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Date: 2012-07-12 11:48:20
Message-ID: CADyhKSXPP4-PNhK1VZa6zpvzxJuyqJJuzyJt6Yep_u3L2ttLNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/7/12 Shigeru HANADA <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module
>>> in core, again.
>>
>> Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with
>> postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink?
>
> Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to
> dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw
> can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator".
> Though this post has had no response...
>
It seems to me what postgresql_fdw_validator() is doing looks like
a function to be named as "libpq_fdw_validator()".

How about your opinion? It will help this namespace conflicts.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-07-12 12:50:39 Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-07-12 11:39:13 Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog