Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com, thom(at)linux(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Date: 2012-01-03 17:11:39
Message-ID: CADyhKSUM3Xm80Dj61kJnh2PqqV05NLP7L3FD3fGcG==iAv9Ppg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/12/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I'd like the regression test on select_view test being committed also
>> to detect unexpected changed in the future. How about it?
>
> Can you resend that as a separate patch?  I remember there were some
> things I didn't like about it, but I don't remember what they were at
> the moment...
>
Sorry for this late response.

The attached one is patch of the regression test that checks scenario
of malicious function with/without security_barrier option.

I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is
patched, not expected/select_views.out.
I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff
between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgsql-regtest-leaky-views.patch application/octet-stream 16.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-03 17:15:47 Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Previous Message Noah Misch 2012-01-03 16:54:38 Re: Patch to allow users to kill their own queries