From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values |
Date: | 2013-07-03 10:08:36 |
Message-ID: | CADxJZo26qe9xjJYSpTU-zCMMU+PQOEBQ5R9rB=2S9m9Bf6T-Gw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 July 2013 17:47, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2013/6/29 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> long time I am thinking about simple function for creating date or
>> timestamp values based on numeric types without necessity to create
>> format string.
>>
>> What do you think about this idea?
> I found so same idea was discussed three years ago
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14107.1276443739@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
I suggested something similar also:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTi=W1wtcL7qR4PuQaQ=UoabmjSUSz6QGJTUCXF-P@mail.gmail.com
The thread I linked died off without reaching a consensus about what
the functions ought to be named, although Josh and Robert were
generally supportive of the idea.
The function signatures I have been using in my own C functions are:
* date(year int, month int, day int) returns date
* datetime(year int, month int, day int, hour int, minute int, second
int) returns timestamp
Cheers,
BJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MauMau | 2013-07-03 10:22:48 | [9.3 bug fix] ECPG does not escape backslashes |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-07-03 09:23:17 | Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values |