Re: Ubuntu 12.04 / 3.2 Kernel Bad for PostgreSQL Performance

From: Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
To: sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 12.04 / 3.2 Kernel Bad for PostgreSQL Performance
Date: 2012-12-06 07:51:41
Message-ID: CADmi=6PZ_Ju85sTcqaMzg3bugcqMm7XDA8hfWQNJpUEHt5nuMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> wrote:

> This isn't a question, but a kind of summary over a ton of investigation
> I've been doing since a recent "upgrade". Anyone else out there with
> "big iron" might want to confirm this, but it seems pretty reproducible.
> This seems to affect the latest 3.2 mainline and by extension, any
> platform using it. My tests are restricted to Ubuntu 12.04, but it may
> apply elsewhere.

I'm not seeing this on our production systems. I haven't run benchmarks.

One of our systems currently has a mixture of PG 8.4 shards running on
Ubuntu 10.04 (2.6 kernel) and PG 9.1 shards running on Ubuntu 12.04
(3.2 kernel). Load & cpu utilization (per 'top') are comparable.
Shards have 64GB of RAM, shared_buffers=3GB, 60 active connections.

Another production PG 9.1 system with shared_buffers=5GB also seems
fine. Old load graphs show the load is comparable from when it was
running Ubuntu 10.04.

My big systems are still all on Ubuntu 10.04 (cut over in January I expect).

--
Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Lister 2012-12-06 08:29:46 Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]
Previous Message classical_89 2012-12-06 03:08:07 Perform scan on Toast table