| From: | Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
| Date: | 2012-11-27 14:43:30 |
| Message-ID: | CADAkt-jjT8s1tMwi_2wO4xkdC2Q_y6xSiBx0ownCR_jXuPaSPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether
>> > the server has finished starting up. If someone came with a plausible
>>
>> Rename the utility to pg_isready?
>
> +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would
> not need extra options like the number of packages sent.
I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow.
> --
> Michael Paquier
> http://michael.otacoo.com
Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited
connectivity where I am.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-11-27 15:02:58 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-11-27 14:41:37 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |