Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq

From: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq
Date: 2013-02-11 21:42:02
Message-ID: CADAkt-hMTTL6Q6Mu1_YGT5nLbBPeKrdKWo-pHU5aEXzZs7BEQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04.02.2013 17:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> Phil Sorber wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Phil Sorber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Alvaro
>>>>> Herrera<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, no existing code can use this new functionality? That seems
>>>>>> disappointing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote this because I wanted to use it in pg_isready. I also wrote
>>>>> something for pg_isready to get around not having this. I think adding
>>>>> these two functions to libpq would be the better option, but wanted
>>>>> something that could fix an existing issue without having to patch
>>>>> libpq so late in the 9.3 development process. Actually, I think it was
>>>>> you who suggested that approach.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I realize that (and yes, I did). But is no code other than
>>>> pg_isready doing this? Not even the libpq URI test program?
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it probably would be able to benefit from this. Are you
>>> suggesting I patch that too? I thought it was usually frowned upon to
>>> touch random bits of working code like that. I'd be more than happy to
>>> do it if it helps build the case for getting this added.
>>
>>
>> Well, this qualifies as refactoring, so yeah, it helps the case.
>
>
> I think this patch would simplift the patch to pass a connection string to
> pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/005501cdfa45$6b0eec80$412cc580$@kommi@huawei.com.
> I note that pg_dumpall also has a similar issue as pg_basebackup and
> pg_receivexlog; there's no way to pass a connection string to it either.
>
> If you could come up with a unified patch that takes care of all of those,
> that would be great.

I will take a look.

>
> - Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-02-11 21:58:14 Re: palloc unification
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-11 21:39:06 Re: send Describe Portal message in PQsendPrepare