Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-09-13 01:17:24
Message-ID: CAD21AoCtWJ8MyrUFRS+Cqq97hhiLO_7+BK40KVwqZ7OKGSLfhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 9/12/13 3:00 AM, Samrat Revagade wrote:
>>
>> We are improving the patch for Commit Fest 2 now.
>> We will fix above compiler warnings as soon as possible and submit
>> the patch
>>
>>
>> Attached *synchronous_transfer_v5.patch* implements review comments from
>> commit fest-1 and reduces the performance overhead of synchronous_transfer.
>
> There is still this compiler warning:
>
> syncrep.c: In function ‘SyncRepReleaseWaiters’:
> syncrep.c:421:6: warning: variable ‘numdataflush’ set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>

Sorry I forgot fix it.

I have attached the patch which I modified.

Regards,

-------
Sawada Masahiko

Attachment Content-Type Size
synchronous_transfer_v6.patch application/octet-stream 23.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-09-13 01:42:31 background workers, round three
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-09-13 00:13:59 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster