| From: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |
| Date: | 2014-12-09 15:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoCCO-o6PyQOn-2ok9WRdTXkuWjHChNHGvaA8oU00Wkscw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> ISTM that REINDEX is not consistent with VACUUM, ANALYZE or CLUSTER in
>> the way it issues NOTICE messages.
>
>> I'm inclined to simply remove the NOTICE messages, except when a
>> REINDEX ... VERBOSE is requested.
>
> My recollection is that those other commands do issue messages always,
> but at some DEBUGn log level when not VERBOSE. Ideally REINDEX would
> adopt that same behavior.
>
So it seems to that REINDEX command issues messages as INFO level when
that is specified VERBOSE option.
If not specified, it issue message as DEBUG2.
Regards,
-------
Sawada Masahiko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-12-09 16:37:44 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-09 14:59:24 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |