From: | Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
Date: | 2014-10-25 06:19:34 |
Message-ID: | CACQjQLrmSbVx-wPnbFO4AZF_tUNdaEGnhLJK8S9=onW1eLM2HQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-10-25 10:29 GMT+07:00 Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I fixed small issue in regress tests and I enhanced tests for varlena
>> types and null values.
>
> Thanks.
>
> it is about 15% faster than original implementation.
>
> 15% faster than array_agg(scalar)? I haven't verify the performance, but
> because the internal array data and null bitmap is copied as-is, that will
> be faster.
>
> 2014-10-25 1:51 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> Hi Ali
>>
>
>> I checked a code. I am thinking so code organization is not good.
>> accumArrayResult is too long now. makeMdArrayResult will not work, when
>> arrays was joined (it is not consistent now). I don't like a usage of
>> state->is_array_accum in array_userfunc.c -- it is signal of wrong
>> wrapping.
>>
> Yes, i was thinking the same. Attached WIP patch to reorganizate the code.
> makeMdArrayResult works now, with supplied arguments act as override from
> default values calculated from ArrayBuildStateArray.
>
> In array_userfunc.c, because we don't want to override ndims, dims and
> lbs, i copied array_agg_finalfn and only change the call to
> makeMdArrayResult (we don't uses makeArrayResult because we want to set
> release to false). Another alternative is to create new
> makeArrayResult-like function that has parameter bool release.
>
adding makeArrayResult1 (do you have better name for this?), that accepts
bool release parameter. array_agg_finalfn becomes more clean, and no
duplicate code in array_agg_anyarray_finalfn.
> next question: there is function array_append(anyarray, anyelement). Isn't
>> time to define array_append(anyarray, anyarray) now?
>>
>
> There is array_cat(anyarray, anyarray):
>
> /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * array_cat :
> * concatenate two nD arrays to form an nD array, or
> * push an (n-1)D array onto the end of an nD array
>
> *----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> */
>
Regards,
--
Ali Akbar
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array_agg_anyarray-9.patch | text/x-patch | 33.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-10-25 06:33:12 | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-10-25 05:50:42 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.2 |