Re: Function array_agg(array)

From: Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function array_agg(array)
Date: 2014-10-27 02:11:11
Message-ID: CACQjQLp6-xMf1Yn1yDrj2gJBaL5kD8C2VP=Pz0DPo1wq70pUtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-10-27 1:38 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Hi
>
> My idea is using new ArrayBuilder optimized for building multidimensional
> arrays with own State type. I think so casting to ArrayBuildState is base
> of our problems, so I don't would to do. Code in array_agg_* is simple,
> little bit more complex code is in nodeSubplan.c. Some schematic changes
> are in attachments.
>

Thanks! The structure looks clear, and thanks for the example on
nodeSubplan.c. I will restructure the v10 of the patch to this structure.

Regards,
--
Ali Akbar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2014-10-27 04:12:10 Re: [HACKERS] ltree::text not immutable?
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2014-10-27 01:48:55 Re: Reducing lock strength of adding foreign keys