Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load

From: Chris Redekop <chris(at)replicon(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
Date: 2011-11-02 15:29:56
Message-ID: CAC2SuRLuk=gzH06f=U4KwcgAZYC689rUFAWtoKDRtaZJYZX3qw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

okay, sorry I'm a little confused then. Should I be able to apply both the
v2 patch as well as the v3 patch? or is it expected that I'd have to
manually do the merge?

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Chris Redekop <chris(at)replicon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > looks like the v3 patch re-introduces the pg_subtrans issue...
>
> No, I just separated the patches to be clearer about the individual
> changes.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-11-02 15:39:07 pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-11-02 15:25:01 Re: Core Extensions relocation