Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

From: Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date: 2013-12-04 08:30:38
Message-ID: CABzZFEvC0LWjDBdTi3WwB+JtAzZmBBP6FbjcaT8XV+QhinmUsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >I've cleaned this up - revision attached - and marked it "ready for
> committer".
> Thank you for this.
>
I did the basic hygiene test. The patch applies correctly and compiles
with no warnings. Did not find anything broken in basic functionality.
In the documentation i have a minor suggestion of replacing phrase "might
judge to be a non-distinct " with ->" may judge to be non- distinct".

regards
Sameer

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-stat-statements-calls-under-estimation-propagation-tp5738128p5781577.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2013-12-04 08:31:50 Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2013-12-04 08:21:26 Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists