From: | samthakur74 <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |
Date: | 2013-09-15 06:54:01 |
Message-ID: | CABzZFEuyM40AWHtr=m-zeKmLmEzjWhyqmVm6O_TEkJRFrK8AHw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >You have added this email to the commit fest, but it contains no patch.
>
>Please add the email with the actual patch.
>
I hope its attached now!
> Maybe the author should be
> >given a chance to update the patches, though, because they are quite
> >old.
>
I did connect with Daniel and he did have some improvement ideas. I am not
sure when they could be implemented. Since we have a interest in the
current version of the patch, which needed documentation, i tried to
complete that.
Thank you,
Sameer
pg_stat_statements-identification-v4.patch.gz (8K) <http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5770937/0/pg_stat_statements-identification-v4.patch.gz>
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-stat-statements-calls-under-estimation-propagation-tp5738128p5770937.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-09-15 09:01:35 | Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior |
Previous Message | Kevin | 2013-09-15 05:13:22 | Questions about checksum feature in 9.3 |