Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production?

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production?
Date: 2011-11-03 17:59:37
Message-ID: CABV9wwNVjLHAae28aCTs5Z_dZ7mRTYV_NBLpNyrOpvA6MgnAHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Benjamin Smith
<lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:39:25 AM Thomas Strunz wrote:
>> I guess go Intel
>> route or some other crazy expensive enterprise stuff.
>
> It's advice about some of the "crazy expensive enterprise" stuff that I'm
> seeking...? I don't mind spending some money if I get to keep up this level of
> performance, but also am not looking to make somebody's private plane payment,
> either.

There's a pretty varied mix of speed, durability, and price with any
SSD based architecture, but the two that have proven best in our
testing and production use (for ourselves and our clients) seem to be
Intel (mostly 320 series iirc), and Fusion-IO. I'd start with looking
at those.

Robert Treat
conjecture: xzilla.net
consulting: omniti.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2011-11-03 18:09:16 Re: FATAL: password authentication failed for user "postgres"
Previous Message Ronan Dunklau 2011-11-03 16:57:15 First "beta" of multicorn FDW on pgxn