Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

From: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date: 2011-11-04 19:47:52
Message-ID: CABV9wwMms=tfxLGKp-CJkX1ET-ePupSJjEhGBHW7=2RWNntTSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>>    If waiting == true, then state = WAITING
>>    else
>>      state = appropriate state
>
> No, I think the state and waiting columns should be completely independent.
>

If they aren't I don't think we need both columns. +1 for leaving them
independent though.

Robert Treat
play: xzilla.net
work: omniti.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2011-11-04 19:51:49 Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-04 19:39:19 Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks