Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date: 2011-12-06 11:49:29
Message-ID: CABUevEzM_nOLoMgPJpyPK1Dtdrj7geN8SC-ixP4p_LGGqb-rRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 14:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
>>> happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.
>>
>> Yes, will do.
>
> Simon,
>
> I believe that we are still waiting for this.

Are we going to hear anything back on this one for the current CF? If
not, I suggest we go with Fujiis version for now - we can always
change it for a potentially better version later.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-12-06 12:00:46 Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-12-06 11:38:30 Re: IDLE in transaction introspection