Re: Upcoming back-branch releases

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2012-11-26 21:35:05 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> > We're about due for a new set of back-branch update releases. After
>> > some discussion among the packagers, it seems the best window for
>> > getting this done before the holiday season sets in is next week.
>> >
>> > Also, as previously mentioned, we're experimenting with weekday
>> > rather than over-the-weekend release windows, since this is much
>> > more convenient for Dave Page and his crew at EDB.
>> >
>> > The current plan is to wrap tarballs on Monday Dec 3 for public
>> > announcement Thursday Dec 6.
>> >
>> >
>> There is one open bug reported by Amit Kapila that I feel is important. I'd
>> investigated this and Simon had volunteered to fix the same.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-10/msg01584.php
>
> I have submitted a proposed fix for it friday:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20121124155005.GA10299%40awork2.anarazel.de
>
> For some reason the web ui only shows one of the the attachements
> though...

Did you by any chance use git-send-email to send it?

That one is known to confuse how majordomo sticks it in the mbox files
that are then later used to generate the archives...

(Yes, a better way to deal with that is in the works. But it would
certainly help to know if that's how the email was created, so we have
more datapoints)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/