pg_receivexlog and replication slots

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Date: 2014-07-11 09:08:48
Message-ID: CABUevEx+zrOHZOQg+dPapNPFRJdsk59b=TSVf30Z71GnFXhQaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is there a particular reason why pg_receivexlog only supports using
manually created slots but pg_recvlogical supports creating and
dropping them? Wouldn't it be good for consistency there?

I'm guessing it's related to not being exposed over the replication
protocol? We had a discussion earlier that I remember about being able
to use an "auto-drop" slot in pg_basebackup, but this would be
different - this would be about creating and dropping a regular
physical replication slot...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-11 09:14:22 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-07-11 08:55:53 Re: RLS Design