Re: pgfoundry references in docs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgfoundry references in docs
Date: 2012-07-04 15:17:52
Message-ID: CABUevEwu5Rnw0HGDxxmczhoWLdP1bzk8_ffxaQb0b1Rf7Su=KA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a
>> replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in
>> listing all the different third party sites out there. (For example,
>> we had a reference to sourceforge.net in the same paragraph. And while
>> that was certainly "state of the art" when the docs were written, I
>> don't think anybody sane would recommend that today. The reality keeps
>> changing on those things, so it really doesn't belong in the docs). We
>> could put a set of links on the wiki if we want something "more live".
>
> Ah, then perhaps a link to such a wiki page would suffice. I think that would be a good compromise.

That can really be said for all of Appendix H in that case...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-07-04 15:20:48 Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2012-07-04 15:17:26 [PATCH] pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order