From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
Date: | 2012-01-18 13:27:12 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwh+b54vzOUUsC=LUYn64AgAbGesRtRh9gVr0sc_HiDPA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:43, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2012 11:57 AM, Scott Mead wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Pretty delayed, but please find the attached patch that addresses all
>>>> the issues discussed.
>>>
>>>
>>> The docs on this v4 look like they suffered a patch order problem here.
>>> In the v3, you added a whole table describing the pg_stat_activity
>>> documentation in more detail than before. v4 actually tries to remove those
>>> new docs, a change which won't even apply as they don't exist upstream.
>>>
>>> My guess is you committed v3 to somewhere, applied the code changes for
>>> v4, but not the documentation ones. It's easy to do that and end up with a
>>> patch that removes a bunch of docs the previous patch added. I have to be
>>> careful to always do something like "git diff origin/master" to avoid this
>>> class of problem, until I got into that habit I did this sort of thing
>>> regularly.
>>>
>> gak
>
>
> I did a 'backwards' diff last time. This time around, I diff-ed off of a
> fresh pull of 'master' (and I did the diff in the right direction.
>
> Also includes whitespace cleanup and the pg_stat_replication (procpid ==>
> pid) regression fix.
>
I'm reviewing this again, and have changed a few things around. I came
up with a question, too :-)
Right now, if you turn off track activities, we put "<command string
not enabled>" in the query text. Shouldn't this also be a state, such
as "disabled"? It seems more consistent to me...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2012-01-18 14:03:57 | Re: Simulating Clog Contention |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2012-01-18 09:49:26 | Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps |