Re: plpgsql.consistent_into

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql.consistent_into
Date: 2014-01-17 13:50:31
Message-ID: CABRT9RBkT2kAYaw1bQV9bs0Eb5L7usfQKEd33T33trPEuLkXYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> Do we actually support = right now? We already support
>
> v_field := field FROM table ... ;
>
> and I think it's a bad idea to have different meaning for = and :=.

That was already discussed before. Yes, we support both = and := and
they have exactly the same behavior; I agree, we should keep them
equivalent.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-01-17 13:57:25 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance
Previous Message Thom Brown 2014-01-17 13:43:25 Re: wal_buffers = -1