Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-10-24 12:03:22
Message-ID: CABOikdN+teYQq_DvqPiYjeXcWMO1VP7B1RBnN_D85qnMUQWsoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> . Or would the recovery logic apply first WAL without looking at the page
> lsn ? (Sorry, may be I should read the code instead of asking you)
>
>
Never mind. I realized it has to. That's the whole purpose of backing it up
in the first place.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-24 12:15:51 Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2013-10-24 11:15:40 Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup