Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date: 2016-10-02 13:58:43
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTxxP2Tx-74xkdjjKithYcZ0FvaNZxd+Uai-hhfeKj5=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, so I have done a review of this patch keeping that in mind as
> that's the consensus. I am still getting familiar with the code...

Returned with feedback for now. This just needs polishing so feel free
to move it to the next CF once you have a new patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-02 14:01:43 Re: Minor improvement to fdwhandler.sgml
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-02 13:56:33 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+