Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar stream for backup_label

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar stream for backup_label
Date: 2017-03-15 03:06:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTt5PwjrrweHg5B6FW+M2v59uYttNWZbn5L62EZQd441w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:34 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> This thread is stalled and it looks like the patch may not be workable,
> at least in the current form.
>
> I will mark this a "Returned with Feedback" on 2017-03-17 unless there
> are arguments to the contrary.

Or even rejected would be fine. I am also not sure if changing the
number of tarballs of the fetch mode is worth breaking to get a look
earlier at the backup_label file, still the patch as it stands is no
good.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-15 03:10:25 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-03-15 03:02:35 Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes