Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date: 2016-02-02 00:58:11
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTmoB1NuLLx5sQoAcTppTW3rZR5JLcrvmqR5sAjLzRz6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Seems OK to me. Thanks for the time and improvements!
>>
>> Thanks. Perhaps a committer could have a look then? I have switched
>> the patch as such in the CF app. Seeing the accumulated feedback
>> upthread that's something that should be backpatched.
>
> Yeah. On 9.4 there are already some conflicts, and I'm sure there will
> be more in almost each branch. Does anyone want to volunteer for
> producing per-branch versions?

I don't mind doing it once we have something fully-bloomed for master,
something that I guess is very likely to apply easily to 9.5 as well.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-02-02 00:59:14 Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-02 00:56:40 Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions