Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Date: 2014-08-25 06:48:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTOUOoMT=HQUvTu5PJQu0Tt1Wd0zfhihsidfsf2BKE7bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached WIP patch adds "-C (--concurrently)" option for reindexdb
> command for concurrently reindexing.
> If we specify "-C" option with any table then reindexdb do reindexing
> concurrently with minimum lock necessary.
> Note that we cannot use '-s' option (for system catalog) and '-C'
> option at the same time.
> This patch use simple method as follows.
>
> 1. Do "CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY" new index which has same definition
> as target index
> 2. Aquire ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK to target table( and transaction starts)
> 3. Swap old and new index
> 4. Drop old index
> 5. COMMIT
>
> These process are based on pg_repack(or pg_reorg) does, done via SQL.

This would be a useful for users, but I am not sure that you can call
that --concurrently as the rename/swap phase requires an exclusive
lock, and you would actually block a real implementation of REINDEX
CONCURRENTLY (hm...).

> ToDo
> - Multi language support for log message.
Why? I am not sure that's something you should deal with.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2014-08-25 06:48:39 Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2014-08-25 06:36:25 Concurrently option for reindexdb